Published snapshot: · Checking for updates…
We collected 232 documents mentioning Anthropic over seven days. The reading below describes that sample of discussion, not the views of everyone who uses it.
This reading is about the company itself. Its models and products have separate readings below; their scores are not averaged into this one.
Lower = more trust-leaning discussion; higher = more concern. This is sentiment, not a test of reliability or safety.
Small differences near 50 are not evidence of a better model. Read the original sources below.
These are separate readings from model-specific posts, not shares of the company score. Lower means more trust, higher means more concern. All readings cover 7 days; small differences do not establish a winner.
201 posts & articles · Effective sample: 138.4
No recent version-specific reactions collected. Family-level mentions are not assigned to individual versions.
Version cards show mentions and original reactions, not a ranked trust score. They do not inherit this family's score.
Original · EN · English · detectedJust another indication that Anthropic & all the rest never have "humanity's best interest" at heart. They could have been watermarking their output (facilitating cleaning the slop out of our information ecosystem) all along. They're only doing it now because of the EU AI Act. >>
Linked origin: bsky.app.
No publisher-policy review is recorded here. Unknown does not mean unreliable or fake.
Claim: not fact-checked by this project. Sentiment analysis is not fact-checking.
Account identity and expertise are not independently verified. Likes, followers and reposts measure attention, not truth.
Original · EN · English · detectedAnthropic thinks they should be able to kill 50 people at a time. www.forever-wars.com/no-bailouts-... @attackerman.bsky.social
Linked origin: bsky.app.
No publisher-policy review is recorded here. Unknown does not mean unreliable or fake.
Claim: not fact-checked by this project. Sentiment analysis is not fact-checking.
Account identity and expertise are not independently verified. Likes, followers and reposts measure attention, not truth.
Emotional scores are machine-generated estimates about a statement, not an assessment of the speaker. Visible excerpts have identified source languages and cached English and Hungarian translations. Untranslated or unknown-language excerpts are held back, but may still contribute to the index.